Laminar airflow and mixing ventilation: Which is better for operating room airflow distribution near an orthopedic surgical patient?

BACKGROUND: There has been little research on the performance of laminar airflow (LAF) and mixing ventilation (MV) systems regarding clean airflow distribution near a surgical patient in operating rooms (ORs). The objective of this study was to examine the performance of LAF and MV systems in ORs at St Olavs Hospital in Norway. METHODS: Experimental measurements were conducted in 2 ORs equipped with LAF and MV systems. RESULTS: Under real operating conditions, airflow distribution from the LAF system was disrupted, and airflow velocity became significantly lower than that of MV above the lying patient. Airflow pattern was observed as distributed vertically downward and horizontally with LAF and MV, respectively. Turbulence intensity of supply airflow from LAF was much lower than that of MV. CONCLUSIONS: The airflow distribution by LAF system in close proximity to a patient is greatly affected by thermal plumes generated above incisions by both patients and surgical facilities. The effect of surgical facilities on airflow distribution by using MV is not significant compared to LAF ventilation. New guidelines are needed for the design of clean airflow distribution systems in the vicinity of surgical patients in ORs.

Do surgeons and surgical facilities disturb the clean air distribution close to a surgical patient in an orthopedic operating room with laminar airflow?

BACKGROUND: Airflow distribution in the operating room plays an important role in ensuring a clean operating microenvironment and preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by airborne contaminations. The objective of this study was to characterize the airflow distribution in proximity to a patient in an orthopedic operating room. METHODS: Experimental measurements were conducted in a real operating room at St. Olav's Hospital, Norway, with a laminar airflow system. Omnidirectional anemometers were used to investigate the air distribution in the operating zone, and 4 different cases were examined with a real person and a thermal manikin. RESULTS: This study showed that the downward airflow from the laminar airflow system varies in each case with different surgical arrangement, such as the position of the operating lamp. The results indicate that the interaction of thermal plumes from a patient and the downward laminar airflow may dominate the operating microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: The airflow distribution in proximity to a patient is influenced by both the surgical facility and the presence of medical staff. A thermal manikin may be an economical and practical way to study the interaction of thermal plumes and downward laminar airflow. The provision of higher clean airflow rate in the operating microenvironment may be an effective way to prevent the development of SSIs caused by indoor airborne contamination.

Are cold light sources really cold?

BACKGROUND: A fiber optic light source is the central part of endoscopic surgery. However, the light generation process causes heat transmission from a source to tip of a scope. In this study, we measured the amount of heating and pathologic effects of direct contact with the tip of scopes on the small bowel in an experimental set-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temperature measurements were performed at the tip of 4 different scopes (Aesculap, Olympus, Karl Storz, and Richard Wolf), which were connected to either of 3 different xenon light sources (Olympus, Richard Wolf, Karl Storz). Temperatures at the outlet of light sources and the tip of fiber optic cables were measured as well. Tissue samples from the small bowel of a pig were obtained after exposing them to direct contact with the tip of the scopes or the fiber optic cable. RESULTS: The temperature measurements at the tip of the scopes varied between 60 degrees C and 100 degrees C (Celsius). The temperatures showed a wide variation according to the type of light source and fiber optic cable the scopes were connected to. The average temperature at the outlet of the light sources and the tip of fiber optic cables was 750 degrees C and 250 degrees C, respectively. The microscopic scores of the small bowel injury induced by exposition to the heat at the tip of the scopes were significantly high after 5 seconds of contact. Direct contact of the tip of the fiber optic cable caused total carbonization in the wall of the small bowel. CONCLUSION: Direct contact of the tip of the scope with small bowel may cause functional and cytologic injury even after short durations of exposure. Therefore, we do not recommend direct contact of scopes with the intra-abdominal organs to avoid heat injuries. In addition, this study also emphasizes the variation in heat generation at the tip of the scopes when used with a mismatching light source and fiber optic cable.